Sometimes, everything looks perfect on the surface. The Node.js app is snappy, logs are going exactly where you want them, and the performance metrics appear respectable—even under a healthy testing load. That was how my recent experiment began. I hooked up Winston to handle logs, fired up k6 to generate traffic, and kicked back to see if everything would hold together.
Initial Performance Numbers
Hidden Problem
Why It’s Terrifying
What This Means in Practice
Even though things looked okay on the front end, Winston-MySQL couldn’t keep up with the log volume. Winston+MySQL, by default, was processing logs one by one through a Node.js stream. Over time, the queue just ballooned, and if anything went wrong, a huge chunk of important log data could simply be lost.
Decent Early Results
The Domino Effect
Why It’s Risky
Lessons Learned
CloudWatch felt fine at lower volumes but quickly turned into a showstopper under heavier traffic. Instead of giving us reliable insights, it caused resource contention that brought the house down.
Both Winston-MySQL and Winston-CloudWatch have their places, but these examples highlight how important it is to choose the right logging strategy for your specific load. Your logs should be fast, reliable, and never the source of crashes or major bottlenecks.
No one wants to stay up at night worrying about incomplete logs or random crashes. Logging might not be the flashiest part of the application, but it’s one of the most critical. And when it’s done poorly, it can have a bigger impact on performance and reliability than almost anything else in your stack.